Steven McGrew v. City of Wichita Falls Texas et al
Filing
11
ORDER ACCEPTING 6 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED as barred by the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 7/7/2014) (ctf)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
WILLIAM STEVEN MCGREW, SR.
(TDCJ No. 1775946),
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Plaintiff,
V.
CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, ET AL.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO.:
3:14-CV-679-B
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in
this case. Plaintiff filed objections, and the District Court has made a de novo review of those portions
of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made. The
objections are overruled, and the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and
Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge.
Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED as barred by the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(g). This dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff’s right to reopen the case if he pays the
$350.00 filing fee and the $50.00 administrative fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this order.
To the extent, if any, that Plaintiff presents claims cognizable in a petition for writ of habeas
corpus, such claims are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.
SO ORDERED this 7th day of July, 2014
_________________________________
JANE J. BOYLE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?