Steven McGrew v. City of Wichita Falls Texas et al

Filing 11

ORDER ACCEPTING 6 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED as barred by the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 7/7/2014) (ctf)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION WILLIAM STEVEN MCGREW, SR. (TDCJ No. 1775946), § § § § § § § § § § Plaintiff, V. CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, ET AL., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:14-CV-679-B ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. Plaintiff filed objections, and the District Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED as barred by the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff’s right to reopen the case if he pays the $350.00 filing fee and the $50.00 administrative fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. To the extent, if any, that Plaintiff presents claims cognizable in a petition for writ of habeas corpus, such claims are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. SO ORDERED this 7th day of July, 2014 _________________________________ JANE J. BOYLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?