Grothe v. Colvin
Filing
26
ORDER ACCEPTING 25 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The court has under consideration the findings, conclusions and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney. The district cour t reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the court ACCEPTS the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. It is therefore ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (docket entry 21 ) is GRANTED and the final decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the magistrate judge's findings, conclusions and recommendation. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 8/13/2015) (bdb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
CHRISTOPHER GROTHE,
Plaintiff,
VS.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:14-CV-0930-G (BF)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The court has under consideration the findings, conclusions and
recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney. The district
court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain
error. Finding none, the court ACCEPTS the findings, conclusions and
recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
It is therefore ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment
(docket entry 21) is GRANTED and the final decision of the Commissioner is
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the
magistrate judge’s findings, conclusions and recommendation.
August 13, 2015.
___________________________________
A. JOE FISH
Senior United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?