Dolenz v. Dallas Observer et al

Filing 16

ORDER ACCEPTING 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Plaintiff's 13 motion for clarification of order accepting findings of U.S. Magistrate Judge and judgment of 4/17/2014, is construed as a motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 59(e), and is DENIED. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 5/15/2014) (twd)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION

BERNARD DOLENZ,
Plaintiff,
VS.
DALLAS OBSERVER, ET AL.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:14-CV-1188-G (BH)

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the
findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge
and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court is of
the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and
they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the court. For the reasons stated
in the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate
Judge, plaintiff’s motion for clarification of order accepting findings of U.S.
Magistrate Judge and judgment of April 17, 2014 (docket entry 13), is construed as a

motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 59(e), and is
DENIED.
SO ORDERED.

May 15, 2014.

___________________________________
A. JOE FISH
Senior United States District Judge

-2-