Jouett Investments Inc et al v. Intuit Inc

Filing 19

ORDER: Having reviewed the motions, response, reply, pleadings, file, record, and the Report, the court determines that the findings and conclusions (Doc. 17 ) are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court grants Intuit 's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Doc. 9 ); dismisses without prejudice this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; and denies as moot Intuit's remaining motions (Doc. 9 ). (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 6/15/2015) (ctf)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
JOUETT INVESTMENTS INC. AND
JOUETT RT ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
INTUIT INC.,
Defendant.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Civil Action No. 3:14-CV-1803-L

ORDER
Before the court is Intuit’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and
Failure to State a Claim for Which Relieve Can be Granted, or in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer
Venue (Doc. 9), filed September 2, 2014. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo
Ramirez, who entered Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate
Judge (“Report”) on May 26, 2015, recommending that the court grant Intuit’s Motion to Dismiss
for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and deny Intuit’s remaining motions as moot. No objections
to the Report were filed.
Having reviewed the motions, response, reply, pleadings, file, record, and the Report, the
court determines that the findings and conclusions are correct, and accepts them as those of the
court. Accordingly, the court grants Intuit’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter
Jurisdiction (Doc. 9); dismisses without prejudice this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction;
and denies as moot Intuit’s remaining motions (Doc. 9).

Order – Page 1

It is so ordered this 15th day of June, 2015.

_________________________________
Sam A. Lindsay
United States District Judge

Order – Page 2