Pine Oaks LLP et al v. Price et al

Filing 7

Order Accepting 5 Findings and Recommendation of the United Stated Magistrate Judge. The Court CERTIFIES that, in the event Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis, any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 7/11/2014) (axm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
PINE OAKES LLP and ALLMARK
PROPERTIES
Plaintiffs,
v.
JORDAN PRICE and TIFFANY
GEORGE,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Civil No. 3:14-CV-2035-N-BK

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in
this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings,
conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the
Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
The Court CERTIFIES that, in the event Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
In support of this finding, the Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge’s
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.21 (5th
Cir. 1997). Based on the Findings and Recommendation, the Court finds that any appeal of this
action would present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous.
Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983).

SO ORDERED this 11th day of July, 2014.

_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE