Gilbert v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Filing
8
ORDER ACCEPTING 7 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE and Denying Certificate of Appealability. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 9/29/2014) (twd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
CHEECKO GILBERT,
Petitioner,
v.
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR,
Respondent.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
3:14-CV-02635-N-BK
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation
in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings,
Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the successive habeas petition is TRANSFERRED
to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. ' 2244(b)(3).
Considering the record in this case and pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure
22(b), Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Sections 2254 and 2255 Proceedings in the United
States District Court, and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), the Court DENIES a certificate of appealability.
The Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions
and Recommendation filed in this case in support of its finding that the petitioner has failed to
show (1) that reasonable jurists would find this Court’s “assessment of the constitutional claims
debatable or wrong,” or (2) that reasonable jurists would find “it debatable whether the petition
states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right” and “debatable whether [this Court]
was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
If petitioner files a notice of appeal,
( ) petitioner may proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.
(X) petitioner must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in
forma pauperis.
SO ORDERED this September 29, 2014.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?