Randles v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas

Filing 15

ORDER: Having reviewed the pleadings, file, and record in this case, and the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge, the court determines that the 14 findings and conclusions are correct, accepts them as those of the court, grants Defenda nt's 10 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), and dismisses with prejudice this action. The court will issue judgment by separate document pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 58(a). (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 7/10/2015) (ctf)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION § § Plaintiff, § v. § § DEUSTCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY § AMERICAS, as TRUSTEE for § RESIDENTIAL ACCREDIT LOANS, INC., § MORTGAGE ASSET-BACKED § PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES § SERIES 2006-QS8, § § Defendant. § MARK RANDELS, Civil Action No. 3:14-CV-2696-L ORDER This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney, who entered Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) on June 19, 2015, recommending that the court grant Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and dismiss Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant in their entirety. No objections to the Report were filed. Having reviewed the pleadings, file, and record in this case, and the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge, the court determines that the findings and conclusions are correct, accepts them as those of the court, grants Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), and dismisses with prejudice this action. The court will issue judgment by separate document pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 58(a). Order - Page 1 It is so ordered this 10th day of July, 2015. _________________________________ Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge Order - Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?