Osborne v. Thomas
Filing
70
Order Accepting 68 Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff Osbourne's 62 Motion to Amend Final Judgment, and Plaintiff Osbourne's 63 Verified Motion for New Trial, are DENIED. Plaintiff's 69 Objections are OVERRULED. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 4/11/2016) (twd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
JAMAR OSBORNE,
Plaintiffs,
v.
PORSHA R. THOMAS,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
No. 3:14-CV-3432-K-BF
ORDER
After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings,
Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any
objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District
Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are
correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.
Plaintiff Osbourne’s Motion to Amend Final Judgment, filed on January 5, 2016
(doc. 62), and Plaintiff Osbourne’s Verified Motion for New Trial, filed on January 9,
2016 are hereby DENIED. Plaintiff's Objections filed on March 15, 2016 are
OVERRULED.
SO ORDERED
Signed April 11th, 2016.
____________________________________
ED KINKEADE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?