Osborne v. Thomas

Filing 70

Order Accepting 68 Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff Osbourne's 62 Motion to Amend Final Judgment, and Plaintiff Osbourne's 63 Verified Motion for New Trial, are DENIED. Plaintiff's 69 Objections are OVERRULED. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 4/11/2016) (twd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JAMAR OSBORNE, Plaintiffs, v. PORSHA R. THOMAS, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § No. 3:14-CV-3432-K-BF ORDER After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Plaintiff Osbourne’s Motion to Amend Final Judgment, filed on January 5, 2016 (doc. 62), and Plaintiff Osbourne’s Verified Motion for New Trial, filed on January 9, 2016 are hereby DENIED. Plaintiff's Objections filed on March 15, 2016 are OVERRULED. SO ORDERED Signed April 11th, 2016. ____________________________________ ED KINKEADE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?