Johnson-Williams aka Cheryl Angrum v. Mortgage Electronic Registry Systems et al

Filing 32

ORDER: Considering the record in this case and the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's 30 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 3/22/2016) (ash)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION CHERYL JOHNSON-WILLIAMS, a/k/a CHERYL ANGRUM, Plaintiff, v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRY SYSTEMS; SHELLEY ORTOLANI, et al. SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEES, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:14-CV-3927-M ORDER OF THE COURT ON RECOMMENDATION REGARDING REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL Considering the record in this case and the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the Court hereby finds and orders: ( ) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is GRANTED. (X) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED for the following reasons: (X) Plaintiff is not a pauper. A review of the financial information provided by plaintiff shows a monthly income of $3,257.00 and monthly expenses of approximately $2,263.00. Given this financial information showing monthly income exceeding monthly expenses by $994.00, the Court concludes that plaintiff will not suffer undue financial hardship after payment of the $505.00 filing fee. See Prows v. Kastner, 842 F.2d 138, 140 (5th Cir. 1988). Although this Court has denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, plaintiff may challenge the denial by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal with the Clerk of Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, within thirty days after service of the notice required by Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(4). See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5). SIGNED this 22nd day of March, 2016. _________________________________ BARBARA M. G. LYNN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?