Sprint Solutions Inc et al v. Taylor et al
Filing
35
Order Accepting 33 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. It is Ordered that 17 Defendant Bernard McGhee's answer is stricken from the record as a sanction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f) for McGhee 39;s failure to participate in a scheduling conference, appear at a status conference, and respond to a show cause order, without justification or excuse. Plaintiffs may move for clerk's entry of default and a default judgment against McGhee, as appropriate. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 7/6/2015) (jrr)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC. and
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS
COMPANY L.P.,
Plaintiffs,
V.
JOSEPH TAYLOR III, JULIE M.
ROBERTS, TONY E. MIMS,
BERNARD McGHEE and
LATOYA S. TAYLOR,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
NO. 3:14-CV-4124-M (BF)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of
United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney dated June 12, 2015. The Court reviewed the
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Bernard McGhee’s answer (Doc. 17) is
hereby stricken from the record as a sanction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f) for McGhee’s failure to
participate in a scheduling conference, appear at a status conference, and respond to a show cause
order, without justification or excuse. Plaintiffs may move for clerk’s entry of default and a default
judgment against McGhee, as appropriate.
SO ORDERED this 6th day of July, 2015.
_________________________________
BARBARA M. G. LYNN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?