Ream v. City of Heath et al
Filing
63
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court has under consideration the 58 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney. Objections were f iled. The District Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed 58 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation to which objection was made. The objections are overruled. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Liechty's Second 12(b)(6) 45 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and Defendant Garretts Rule 12(c) 47 Motion for Judgment is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 1/14/2016) (ran)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
JOAN REAM,
Plaintiff,
v.
TERRY GARRETT, and
LORNE LIECHTY,
in their individual capacities,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
No. 3:14-CV-4338-B
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the
United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney. Objections were filed. The District Court has made
a de novo review of those portions of the proposed Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation to
which objection was made. The objections are overruled.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Liechty’s Second 12(b)(6) Motion to
Dismiss [D.E. 45] is GRANTED and Defendant Garrett’s Rule 12(c) Motion for Judgment is
DENIED.
SO ORDERED this 14th day of January, 2016.
_________________________________
JANE J. BOYLE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?