MCI Communications Services Inc et al v. Pac-West Telecomm Inc et al

Filing 26

ORDER. CASE TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of Texas. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J) [Transferred from California Eastern on 1/6/2015.]

Download PDF
Case 3:14-md-02587-D Document 19 Filed 12/30/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID 72 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION FILED Jan 06, 2015 CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE: INTRAMTA SWITCHED ACCESS CHARGES LITIGATION MDL No. 2587 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −1) On December 16, 2014, the Panel transferred 26 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See __F.Supp.2d__ (J.P.M.L. 2014). Since that time, no additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of Texas. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Sidney A Fitzwater. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Texas and assigned to Judge Fitzwater. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of Texas for the reasons stated in the order of December 16, 2014, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Sidney A Fitzwater. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. FOR THE PANEL: Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel Dec 30, 2014 CERTIFIED A TRUE COPY ERTIFIED COP KAREN MITCHELL, CLERK AREN CLER By s/*SHAKIRA TODD DEPUTY CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS December 30, 2014 Case 3:14-md-02587-D Document 19 Filed 12/30/14 Page 2 of 5 PageID 73 IN RE: INTRAMTA SWITCHED ACCESS CHARGES LITIGATION MDL No. 2587 SCHEDULE CTO−1 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION 2 14−01961 MCI Communications Services Incorporated et al v. Arizona Telephone Company et al ARIZONA AZ CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CAC 2 14−06965 CAC 2 14−09092 MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. Mpower Communications Corp et al CenturyLink Communications, LLC v. Verizon California Inc. CALIFORNIA EASTERN Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company et al MCI Communications Services, Inc., et al. v. Pac−West Telecomm, Inc., et al. CAE 2 14−01257 CAE 2 14−02070 1 14−01659 Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Level 3 Communications, LLC et al Opposed 12/29/14 Sprint Communications Company, L.P. v. Southern New England Telephone Co et al MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. Charter Fiberlink − Michigan, LLC et al COLORADO CO CONNECTICUT CT 3 14−00802 CT 3 14−01289 DE 1 14−00743 DE 1 14−01298 DE 1 14−01439 DELAWARE Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Verizon Maryland LLC et al Opposed 12/29/14 Sprint Communication Company LP v. Bright House Networks Information Services (Alabama) LLC et al Opposed 12/29/14 Case 3:14-md-02587-D Document 19 Filed 12/30/14 Page 3 of 5 PageID 74 CenturyLink Communications LLC v. Verizon Delaware LLC et al FLORIDA MIDDLE FLM 8 14−02955 Centurylink Communications, LLC v. Verizon Florida, LLC Sprint Communications Company LP v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company et al Sprint Communications Company v. Surewest Telephone et al Sprint Communications v. Surewest Kansas ILLINOIS CENTRAL ILC 2 14−02104 ILC 2 14−02232 ILC 3 14−03255 IOWA NORTHERN IAN 3 14−03028 IAN 3 14−03052 Sprint Communications Company, LP v. Butler−Bremer Mutual Telephone Company et al MCI Communications Services, Inc et al v. Breda Telephone Corp et al 14−00202 Sprint Communications, L.P. v. Citizens Mutual Telephone Cooperative et al 14−00615 MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. Brandenburg Telephone Company et al IOWA SOUTHERN IAS 4 KENTUCKY WESTERN KYW 3 MICHIGAN EASTERN MIE 2 14−12087 MIE 2 14−13464 Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company et al MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. Clear Rate Communications, Inc. et al 14−00565 Sprint Communications Company, LP v. ACE Telephone Company of Michigan, Inc. et al Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company et al MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. Big River Telephone Company, LLC et al MICHIGAN WESTERN MIW 1 MISSOURI EASTERN MOE 4 14−00850 MOE 4 14−01529 MISSOURI WESTERN Case 3:14-md-02587-D Document 19 Filed 12/30/14 Page 4 of 5 PageID 75 5 14−06049 Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. K.L.M. Telephone Company et al 4 14−03181 MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. Arlington Telephone Company et al 2 14−00905 Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Nevada Bell Telephone Company et al NJ 2 14−05573 NJ 2 14−07318 MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. et al v. ALLEGIANCE TELECOM OF NEW JERSEY et al CENTURYLINK COMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. VERIZON NEW JERSEY, INC. et al MOW NEBRASKA NE NEVADA NV NEW JERSEY NEW YORK NORTHERN NYN 1 14−01103 MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. Berkshire Telephone Corporation et al NEW YORK SOUTHERN NYS 1 14−03453 NYS 1 14−07188 NYS 1 14−09376 Sprint Communications Company, L.P. v. Verizon New England, Inc. et al MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. Alteva of Warwick LLC et al Centurylink Communications, LLC v. Verizon New England Inc. et al NORTH DAKOTA ND 3 14−00088 ND 4 14−00065 MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. 360Networks (USA) Inc. et al Sprint Communications Company, L.P. v. Dakota Central Telecommunications Cooperative, Inc. et al Opposed 12/29/14 OHIO SOUTHERN OHS 2 14−00610 OHS 2 14−01457 Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Chillicothe Telephone Company et al Opposed 12/29/14 MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. The Opposed 12/29/14 Chillicothe Telephone Company et al PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN PAW 1 SOUTH DAKOTA 14−00240 MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. et al v. ARMSTRONG TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al Case 3:14-md-02587-D Document 19 Filed 12/30/14 SD 4 14−04099 SD 4 14−04139 Page 5 of 5 PageID 76 Sprint Communications Company, L.P. v. Alliance Communications Cooperative, Inc. et al Opposed 12/23/14 MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. Alliance Communications Cooperative, Inc. et al Opposed 12/23/14 VIRGINIA EASTERN VAE 1 14−01604 CenturyLink Communications, LLC v. Verizon South, Inc. et al 14−00741 Sprint Communications Company LP v. Wisconsin Bell Inc et al Sprint Communications Company, L.P. v. Amherst Telephone Company et al Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. The Stoutland Telephone Company WISCONSIN EASTERN WIE 2 WISCONSIN WESTERN WIW 3 14−00464 WIW 3 14−00667

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?