Peterson et al v. City of Duncanville et al

Filing 102

Order Accepting 101 Findings and Recommendations re: 70 Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, filed by Andy Armstrong, Eddie Edwards. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' (Armstrong & Edwards) 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 1/26/2017) (ndt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION KRISTINE PETERSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ANDY ARMSTRONG, et al., Defendants. § § § § § No. 3:15-CV-247-M (BF) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney. The Court reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ (Armstrong & Edwards) 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 70] is GRANTED. SO ORDERED this 26th day of January, 2017. _________________________________ BARBARA M. G. LYNN CHIEF JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?