Duru v. Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Bearkowitz PC et al

Filing 7

Order Adopting 6 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. It is therefore ordered that this action is summarily dismissed without prejudice as duplicative of a pending action, and that plaintiff's 3 motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot. The court certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 3/30/2015) (tln)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
ROSE ADANMA DURU,
Plaintifff,
v.
BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN
CALDWELL & BEARKOWITZ PC,
et al.,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

3:15-CV-0435-D

ORDER
After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the
findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the court concludes that the
findings and conclusions are correct. It is therefore ordered that the findings, conclusions, and
recommendation of the magistrate judge are adopted.
It is therefore ordered that this action is summarily dismissed without prejudice as
duplicative of a pending action, and that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied
as moot.
The court certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See 28
U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). In support of this finding, the court adopts and
incorporates by reference the magistrate judge’s findings, conclusions, and recommendation. See
Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.21 (5th Cir. 1997).

Based on the findings and

recommendation, the court finds that any appeal of this action would present no legal point of
arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.
1983). If plaintiff appeals, she may challenge this certification by filing a separate motion to
proceed in forma pauperis on appeal with the Clerk of the Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth

Circuit. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202; Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5).
SO ORDERED.
March 30, 2015.

_________________________________
SIDNEY A. FITZWATER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-