American Film & Printing, Ltd. v. Cowart Mulch Products, Inc.

Filing 11

ORDER Accepting 10 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. Accordingly, the court denies 6 American Film & Printing, Ltds Motion to Remand; grants Defendants 2 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and dismisses without prejudice this action for lack of personal jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 10/1/2015) (ran)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION AMERICAN FILM & PRINTING, LTD, Plaintiff, v. COWART MULCH PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant. § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:15-CV-682-L ORDER On July 16, 2015, Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney entered Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) (Doc. 10) recommending that the court deny American Film & Printing, Ltd’s Motion to Remand (Doc. 6), filed March 23, 2015; grant Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Doc. 2), filed March 2, 2015; and dismiss without prejudice this action for lack of personal jurisdiction. No objections to the Report were filed. After considering the motions, briefs, pleadings, record in this case, and Report, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court denies American Film & Printing, Ltd’s Motion to Remand (Doc. 6); grants Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Doc. 2); and dismisses without prejudice this action for lack of personal jurisdiction. It is so ordered this 1st day of October, 2015. _________________________________ Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge Order – Solo Page

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?