American Film & Printing, Ltd. v. Cowart Mulch Products, Inc.
Filing
11
ORDER Accepting 10 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. Accordingly, the court denies 6 American Film & Printing, Ltds Motion to Remand; grants Defendants 2 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and dismisses without prejudice this action for lack of personal jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 10/1/2015) (ran)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
AMERICAN FILM & PRINTING, LTD,
Plaintiff,
v.
COWART MULCH PRODUCTS, INC.,
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 3:15-CV-682-L
ORDER
On July 16, 2015, Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney entered Findings, Conclusions and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) (Doc. 10) recommending that
the court deny American Film & Printing, Ltd’s Motion to Remand (Doc. 6), filed March 23, 2015;
grant Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Doc. 2), filed March 2, 2015;
and dismiss without prejudice this action for lack of personal jurisdiction. No objections to the
Report were filed.
After considering the motions, briefs, pleadings, record in this case, and Report, the court
determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them
as those of the court. Accordingly, the court denies American Film & Printing, Ltd’s Motion to
Remand (Doc. 6); grants Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Doc.
2); and dismisses without prejudice this action for lack of personal jurisdiction.
It is so ordered this 1st day of October, 2015.
_________________________________
Sam A. Lindsay
United States District Judge
Order – Solo Page
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?