Hill v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID

Filing 10

ORDER: Before the court is the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge (docket entry 9 ). Because the petitioner, Michael Anthony Hill, paid the necessary filing fee in the time specified in the recommendation, the court refers the case back to the magistrate judge. The recommendation of the magistrate judge is thus rendered MOOT. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 7/31/2015) (axm)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION

MICHAEL ANTHONY HILL
(TDCJ No. 1302155),
Petitioner,
VS.
WILLIAM STEPHENS, Director, Texas
Department of Criminal Justice,
Correctional Institutions Division,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:15-CV-1219-G (BN)

ORDER
Before the court is the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the
United States magistrate judge (docket entry 9). Because the petitioner, Michael
Anthony Hill, paid the necessary filing fee in the time specified in the
recommendation, the court refers the case back to the magistrate judge. The
recommendation of the magistrate judge is thus rendered MOOT.
SO ORDERED.
July 31, 2015.
___________________________________
A. JOE FISH
Senior United States District Judge