Pringle v. USA

Filing 28

Order Accepting 24 Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court, therefore, overrules Petitioner's objections and denies his Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on appeal (Doc. 27 ). (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 2/29/2016) (axm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
MICHAEL PRINGLE,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Civil Action No. 3:15-CV-1455-L

ORDER
This case was referred to Magistrate Judge David L. Horan, who entered Findings,
Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) (Doc. 24) on
January 21, 2016, recommending that the court deny Petitioner’s Application to Proceed In Forma
Pauperis in his interlocutory appeal (Doc. 23). Petitioner filed objections to the Report (Doc. 27).
After carefully reviewing the pleadings, file, objections, applicable law, record in this case,
and Report, and having conducting a de novo review of that portion of the Report to which objection
was made, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct,
and accepts them as those of the court. The court, therefore, overrules Petitioner’s objections and
denies his Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on appeal (Doc. 27).
It is so ordered this 29th day of February, 2016.

_________________________________
Sam A. Lindsay
United States District Judge

Order – Page 1