Williams v. City of Irving, Texas et al
Filing
40
Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 38 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 24 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Bruce Jolly, Eric Curtis, Stephanie Barnes. The court grants Individually Named City Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 24 based on qualified immunity and dismisses with prejudice Plaintiff' s claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(2) against Defendants Stephanie Barnes, Eric Curtis, and Bruce Jolley. As noted in the Report, all state claims against these Defendants remain. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 2/7/2017) (mcrd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
MICHAEL WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF IRVING, et al.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 3:15-CV-1701-L
ORDER
On January 13, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez entered the
Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”),
recommending that the court grant Individually Named City Defendants’ Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment (Doc. 24), filed August 11, 2016, by Defendants Stephanie Barnes, Eric Curtis,
and Bruce Jolley. No objections were filed to the Report.
Having reviewed the motion, briefs, evidence, file, record in this case, and the Report, the
court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts
them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court grants Individually Named City Defendants’
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 24) based on qualified immunity and dismisses with
prejudice Plaintiff’s claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(2) against Defendants Stephanie
Barnes, Eric Curtis, and Bruce Jolley. As noted in the Report, all state claims against these
Defendants remain.
Order - Page 1
It is so ordered this 7th day of February, 2017.
_________________________________
Sam A. Lindsay
United States District Judge
Order - Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?