Williams v. City of Irving, Texas et al

Filing 40

Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 38 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 24 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Bruce Jolly, Eric Curtis, Stephanie Barnes. The court grants Individually Named City Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 24 based on qualified immunity and dismisses with prejudice Plaintiff' s claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(2) against Defendants Stephanie Barnes, Eric Curtis, and Bruce Jolley. As noted in the Report, all state claims against these Defendants remain. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 2/7/2017) (mcrd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MICHAEL WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF IRVING, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:15-CV-1701-L ORDER On January 13, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez entered the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), recommending that the court grant Individually Named City Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 24), filed August 11, 2016, by Defendants Stephanie Barnes, Eric Curtis, and Bruce Jolley. No objections were filed to the Report. Having reviewed the motion, briefs, evidence, file, record in this case, and the Report, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court grants Individually Named City Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 24) based on qualified immunity and dismisses with prejudice Plaintiff’s claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(2) against Defendants Stephanie Barnes, Eric Curtis, and Bruce Jolley. As noted in the Report, all state claims against these Defendants remain. Order - Page 1 It is so ordered this 7th day of February, 2017. _________________________________ Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge Order - Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?