Montelongo v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID

Filing 19

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court is of the opinion that the 15 Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Cou rt. For the reasons stated in the 15 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the petitioner's 14 motion to alter or amend the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) is hereby DENIED. (Ordered by Chief Judge Jorge A Solis on 10/8/2015) (ran)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JOE MONTELONGO, ID # 1266916, Petitioner, vs. ) ) ) ) No. 3:15-CV-1761-P (BH) ) WILLIAM STEPHENS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordancewith28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(l), the Courtis ofthe opinion thattheFindings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the petitioner's motion to alter or amend the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59( e) is hereby DENIED. SO ORDERED. Signed this 81h day of October, 2015. na::;~;o ~~A. SOLIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?