Coleman v. Mejia
Order Accepting 10 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Shad St Ives Coleman. If the petitioner files a notice of appeal, he must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a properly signed certificate of inmate trust account. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 6/16/2017) (epm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHAD ST. IVES COLEMAN,
EDDY M. MEJIA, Warden, FCISeagoville,
CIVIL ACTION NO.
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the
findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge
and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court is of
the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and
they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the court. For the reasons stated
in the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate
Judge, the petition for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is
DISMISSED as moot.
A certificate of appealability (COA) is not required for a federal inmate to
appeal the denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Padilla v. United States, 416
F.3d 424, 425 (5th Cir. 2005). If the petitioner files a notice of appeal, he must pay
the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a
properly signed certificate of inmate trust account.
June 16, 2017.
A. JOE FISH
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?