Thompson v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID

Filing 7

Order Accepting 6 Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court therefore denies 5 Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and directs Petitioner to pay the requisite $5.00 filing fee by 9/7/2015. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal without prejudice of this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 8/18/2015) (axm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION REGINALD DONEY THOMPSON, (TDCJ No. 1897562), Petitioner, v. WILLIAM STEPHENS, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent. § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:15-CV-2246-L-BN ORDER This case was referred to United States Magistrate David L. Horan, who entered Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) on July 24, 2015 (Doc. 6), recommending that the court deny Petitioner’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, and require him to pay the $5.00 filing fee within 21 days of this order. No objections to the Report were filed. Having reviewed the pleadings, file, record in this case, and Report, the court determines that the findings and conclusions are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. The court therefore denies Petitioner’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 5) and directs Petitioner to pay the requisite $5.00 filing fee by September 7, 2015. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal without prejudice of this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). It is so ordered this 18th day of August, 2015. _________________________________ Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge Order – Solo Page

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?