Hardin et al v. City of Lancaster

Filing 32

ORDER ACCEPTING 31 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Defendant City of Lancaster's Rule 12b(1) and 12b(6) 25 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 1/12/2017) (sss)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
DEWAYNE HARDIN and CARROT
LEWIS,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
CITY OF LANCASTER,
Defendant.

§
§
§
§
§ Civil Action No. 3:15-CV-2718-K
§
§
§
§

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings,
Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any
objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District
Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are
correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.
Defendant City of Lancaster’s Rule 12b(1) and 12b(6) Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.
By separate judgment, all of the plaintiff’s claims against City of Lancaster are
DISMISSED without prejudice for want of subject matter jurisdiction.
SO ORDERED.
Signed January 12th, 2017.

ED KINKEADE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE