White et al v. Sierra Auto Financing LLC et al

Filing 38

ORDER ACCEPTING 36 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Sierra Auto Finance, LLC's Rule 12(b)(5) Motion to Dismiss (doc. 7 ) for Insufficient Service of Proces s is DENIED as moot. Further, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Sierra Auto Finance, LLC's Motion for the Court's Abstention and Dismissal (doc. 18 ) is DENIED as moot. Finally, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Sierra Auto Finance, LLC's Supplemental Motion for the Court's Abstention and Dismissal (doc. 29 ) is GRANTED. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 5/2/2016) (ran)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
MARTEEN REED WHITE, and
GREGORY WHITE,
Plaintiffs,
v.
SIERRA AUTO FINANCING, LLC, and
CENTRAL AUTOHAUS & ROBERTS
GROUP,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

No. 3:15-CV-2822-B

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the
United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney. Objections were filed. The District Court has made
a de novo review of those portions of the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation to
which objection was made. The Objections are overruled.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Sierra Auto Finance, LLC’s Rule 12(b)(5)
Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process (doc. 7) is DENIED as moot.
Further, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Sierra Auto Finance, LLC’s Motion for the
Court’s Abstention and Dismissal (doc. 18) is DENIED as moot.
Finally, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Sierra Auto Finance, LLC’s Supplemental Motion
for the Court’s Abstention and Dismissal (doc. 29) is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED, this 2nd day of May, 2016

1

_________________________________
JANE J. BOYLE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2