Richard v. The State of Texas

Filing 7

Order Accepting 5 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION: The court prospectively certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 11/24/2015) (twd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MICHAEL RICHARD, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF TEXAS, Defendant. § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:15-CV-3111-L ORDER This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez, who entered Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) on October 29, 2015, recommending that the action be dismissed with prejudice as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) and counted as a “strike” or “prior occasion” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff, who is incarcerated and proceeding pro se, filed objections to the Report. Having reviewed the pleadings, file, objections, Report, and the record in this case, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, accepts them as those of the court, and dismisses with prejudice this action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). This dismissal shall count as a “strike” or “prior occasion” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The court prospectively certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. 24(a)(3). In support of this certification, the court accepts and incorporates by reference the Report. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 and n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). The court concludes that any appeal of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and would therefore be frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. Order – Page 1 1983). In the event of an appeal, Plaintiff may challenge this certification by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal with clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202; Fed. R. App. 24(a)(5). It is so ordered this 24th day of November, 2015. _________________________________ Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge Order – Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?