Interface Printers LLC v. BGF Global LLC
Filing
11
Order: The court accepts the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and denies without prejudice Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment 7 and orders Plaintiff to file an amended motion for default judgment by 10/12/17 that cures the deficiencies noted by the magistrate judge. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 9/12/2017) (ash)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
INTERFACE PRINTERS, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
BGF GLOBAL, LLC,
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 3:16-CV-607-L
ORDER
On August 28, 2017, United States Magistrate Paul D. Stickney entered the Findings,
Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), recommending
that the court deny without prejudice Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 7), filed
November 18, 2016. No objections to the Report were filed. Having reviewed the motion,
pleadings, file, record in this case, and Report, the court determines that the findings and conclusions
of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court
denies without prejudice Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 7) and orders Plaintiff to
file an amended motion for default judgment by October 12, 2017, that cures the deficiencies noted
by the magistrate judge. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action
without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute or
comply with a court order.
It is so ordered this 12th day of September, 2017.
_________________________________
Sam A. Lindsay
United States District Judge
Order –Solo Page
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?