FFGGP Inc v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company

Filing 34

ORDER ACCEPTING 32 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Defendant's 16 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED except it is DENIED as to the Defendant's proof that Plaintiff's lien is subor dinate to Defendant's lien, and Defendant's 31 request to supplement the record is DENIED. Plaintiff's 20 Motion for Remand and, in the alternative, for Summary Judgment, is DENIED. Defendant is given leave to file one additional Motion for Summary Judgment directed only to the subordination issue. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 9/29/2017) (sss)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION FFGGP, INC., AS TRUSTEE Plaintiff, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Defendant. § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:16-CV-0742-M ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE United States Magistrate Judge Renée Harris Toliver made Findings, Conclusions and a Recommendation in this case. Objections were filed, and the Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation to which objection was made. The objections are overruled and the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED except it is DENIED as to the Defendant’s proof that Plaintiff’s lien is subordinate to Defendant’s lien, and Defendant’s request to supplement the record is DENIED. Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand and, in the alternative, for Summary Judgment, is DENIED. Defendant is given leave to file one additional Motion for Summary Judgment directed only to the subordination issue. SO ORDERED this 29th day of September, 2017.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?