Fraser v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 13

ORDER Accepting 11 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 10/6/2016) (ran)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION YOSEF S. FRASER, § § Plaintiff, § § V. § § COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, § § Defendant. § No. 3:16-cv-939-B ORDER The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case (the “FCR”). Plaintiff filed a response to the FCR, titled “Requesting Permission to Amen[d] Civil Complaint,” in which he stated that he “would like to clarify [his] position.” Dkt. No. 12. Attached to this response is a proposed second amended complaint that attempts to recast this action as an appeal of the denial of Social Security benefits. See Dkt. No. 12-1. But, as Plaintiff represented to this Court previously, he filed this action to “address his concerns of discrimination,” while “[t]he suit [that he] filed in the Sherman Division [of the Eastern District of Texas] is a result of [his] lack of confidence in the SSA,” which action is ostensibly an appeal of an administrative decision to deny Social Security benefits. Dkt. No. 7 at 2. Because Plaintiff has failed to show why this Court should encourage parallel administrative appeals to proceed, his requested amendment is futile. Cf. Winding v. Vincent, No. 3:13CV425TSL–JMR, 2014 WL 1056828, at *1 (S.D. Miss. Mar. 18, 2014) (“By his objection, Winding essentially seeks to amend his complaint in an attempt to recast his claims as ones for retaliation and/conspiracy.... [But] -1- the proposed amendment is futile, [and] plaintiff’s objection will be overruled.”). To that extent that Plaintiff’s response is solely an objection to the FCR, the District Court has reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed FCR to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed FCR for plain error. Finding no error, the Court ACCEPTS the FCR. SO ORDERED. DATE: OCTOBER 6, 2016 _________________________________ JANE J. BOYLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?