Opheim v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
Filing
10
Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 9 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 5 Motion to Dismiss filed by Wells Fargo Bank NA, Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 12/16/2016) (mem)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
CHARLES OPHEIM,
Plaintiffs,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, and
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-1097-N-BK
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in
this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings,
conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the
Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
SO ORDERED this 16th day of December, 2016.
_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
CHARLES OPHEIM,
Plaintiffs,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, and
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-1097-N-BK
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF
THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in
this case. [Plaintiff or Defendants] filed objections, and the District Court has made a de novo
review of those portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which objection was
made. The objections are overruled, and the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
SO ORDERED this ____ day of ___________________, 2016.
_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?