Opheim v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al

Filing 10

Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 9 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 5 Motion to Dismiss filed by Wells Fargo Bank NA, Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 12/16/2016) (mem)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION CHARLES OPHEIM, Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 3:16-CV-1097-N-BK ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. SO ORDERED this 16th day of December, 2016. _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION CHARLES OPHEIM, Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 3:16-CV-1097-N-BK ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. [Plaintiff or Defendants] filed objections, and the District Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. SO ORDERED this ____ day of ___________________, 2016. _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?