Guillen v. Colvin

Filing 33

Order Adopting 32 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's counsel's petition to obtain approval of a fee for representing a social security claimant is granted; attorney Ronald D. H onig is awarded $15,796.25 in attorney's fees certified for payment out of plaintiff's past-due benefits pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b); and the Acting Commissioner is ordered to release such amount as and for an attorneys fee to plaintiff's counsel Ronald D. Honig. Plaintiff's counsel promptly return to plaintiff the $5,158.39 previously awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 12/31/2018) (zkc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ALICE GUILLEN, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 3:16-CV-1397-D ORDER The undersigned district judge has considered the December 14, 2018 findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for plain error. Finding none, the court adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. It is therefore ordered that plaintiff’s counsel’s petition to obtain approval of a fee for representing a social security claimant is granted; attorney Ronald D. Honig is awarded $15,796.25 in attorney’s fees certified for payment out of plaintiff’s past-due benefits pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b); and the Acting Commissioner is ordered to release such amount as and for an attorney’s fee to plaintiff’s counsel Ronald D. Honig. It is further ordered that plaintiff’s counsel promptly return to plaintiff the $5,158.39 previously awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act. SO ORDERED. December 31, 2018. _________________________________ SIDNEY A. FITZWATER SENIOR JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?