Williams v. Livingston et al

Filing 13

ORDER ACCEPTING 12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The plaintiff's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 will be DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The 11 motion for summary judgment is DENIED. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 11/18/2016) (sss)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION

CHARLES ANTHONY WILLIAMS,
ID # 1987727,
Plaintiff,
VS.
BRAD LIVINGSTON,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:16-CV-1684-G (BH)

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the
findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge
and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the
undersigned district judge is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of
the court. By separate judgment, the plaintiff’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 will
be DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and
1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The motion for summary judgment is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

November 18, 2016.

___________________________________
A. JOE FISH
Senior United States District Judge

-2-