Shunatona v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association
Filing
29
ORDER ACCEPTING 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Clerk is directed to file Plaintiff's First Amended Original Complaint. Plaintiff's claim of wrongful foreclosure is dismissed with prejudice and m ay not be reasserted. Per his stipulation, Plaintiff may not assert claims in excess of $75,000. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand [Docket # 15 ] and request to vacate prior orders [Docket # 6 and 13 ] are denied. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 9/27/2016) (trk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
PAUL SHUNATONA,
Plaintiff,
V.
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION,
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
No. 3:16-CV-1694-M
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this
case, the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate
Judge dated September 12, 2016, and the Plaintiff’s Objections, the Court finds that the
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and
they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. The Clerk is
directed to file Plaintiff’s First Amended Original Complaint [Docket #15-1]. Plaintiff’s
claim of wrongful foreclosure is dismissed with prejudice and may not be reasserted.
Per his stipulation, Plaintiff may not assert claims in excess of $75,000. Plaintiff’s
Motion to Remand [Docket #15] and request to vacate prior orders [Docket # 6 and 13]
are denied.
1
SO ORDERED this 27th day of September, 2016.
_________________________________
BARBARA M. G. LYNN
CHIEF JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?