Peak Foreclosure Services Inc v. Finley et al

Filing 45

ORDER ACCEPTING 44 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The United States Marshals Service is ORDERED to inform the Court upon W. Thomas Finley's arrest and to keep him in custody until he responds to the United States' First Set of Post-Judgment Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents and produces the requested documents. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 1/6/2020) (aaa)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PEAK FORECLOSURE SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. No. 3:16-cv-01941-M W. THOMAS FINLEY, CASSIE DEANNE FINLEY, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford dated December 20, 2019. The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in Judge Rutherford’s December 20, 2019 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, it is ORDERED that a Warrant be issued as to W. Thomas Finley for his contempt of this Court’s Orders to respond to the United States’ First Set of Post-Judgment Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents and produce the requested documents. 1 The United States Marshals Service is ORDERED to inform the Court upon W. Thomas Finley’s arrest and to keep him in custody until he responds to the United States’ First Set of Post-Judgment Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents and produces the requested documents. SO ORDERED, this 6th day of January, 2020. __________________________________ BARBARA M. G. LYNN CHIEF JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?