MetroPCS v. Mohammed et al
Filing
27
ORDER: The 26 findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court grants Plaintiff's Motion for Default Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 6/14/2017) (sss)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
METROPCS,
Plaintiff,
v.
KALEEM MOHAMMED a/k/a ABDUL
MOHAMMED a/k/a ABDUL KALEEM
MOHAMMED a/k/a KALEEM ABDUL
MOHAMMED d/b/a A-1 WIRELESS;
and AMER AHMED,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 3:16-CV-1946-L
ORDER
Before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Final Judgment and Permanent
Injunction (Doc. 24), filed October 14, 2016. On April 24, 2017, Magistrate Judge Renee Toliver
entered the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge
(“Report”) recommending that the court grant Plaintiff’s motion and enter default judgment in
favor of Plaintiff. No objections were filed to the report. Having reviewed the record in this case,
Report, and applicable law, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the
magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. * Accordingly, the court
grants Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction and will issue a
Default Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction against all Defendants by separate document
in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.
It is so ordered this 14th day of June, 2017.
_________________________________
Sam A. Lindsay
United States District Judge
*
The court notes that footnotes 2 and 3 of the Report were inadvertently switched. As such, footnote 2 should contain
“Loss” and the accompanying text, and footnote 3 should contain “Damages” and the accompanying text.
Order – Solo Page
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?