MetroPCS v. Mohammed et al

Filing 27

ORDER: The 26 findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court grants Plaintiff's Motion for Default Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 6/14/2017) (sss)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION METROPCS, Plaintiff, v. KALEEM MOHAMMED a/k/a ABDUL MOHAMMED a/k/a ABDUL KALEEM MOHAMMED a/k/a KALEEM ABDUL MOHAMMED d/b/a A-1 WIRELESS; and AMER AHMED, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:16-CV-1946-L ORDER Before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction (Doc. 24), filed October 14, 2016. On April 24, 2017, Magistrate Judge Renee Toliver entered the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) recommending that the court grant Plaintiff’s motion and enter default judgment in favor of Plaintiff. No objections were filed to the report. Having reviewed the record in this case, Report, and applicable law, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. * Accordingly, the court grants Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction and will issue a Default Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction against all Defendants by separate document in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. It is so ordered this 14th day of June, 2017. _________________________________ Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge * The court notes that footnotes 2 and 3 of the Report were inadvertently switched. As such, footnote 2 should contain “Loss” and the accompanying text, and footnote 3 should contain “Damages” and the accompanying text. Order – Solo Page

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?