Adeniran v. Lynch et al

Filing 21

ORDER ACCEPTING 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The petition for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 4/16/2018) (sss)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ADEYEMI SPENCER ADENIRAN, A 203 082 586, Petitioner, vs. LORETTA LYNCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:16-CV-2124-M ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for plain error, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the petition for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability (COA) is not required for a federal inmate to appeal a habeas case under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Padilla v. United States, 416 F.3d 424, 425 (5th Cir. 2005). If the petitioner files a notice of appeal, he must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a properly signed certificate of inmate trust account. SIGNED this 16th day of April, 2018. _________________________________ BARBARA M. G. LYNN CHIEF JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?