Napper v. Chief US Marshal et al
Filing
6
Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 5 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 3 Complaint, filed by Jessy Napper. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 11/29/2016) (mem)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
JESSY NAPPER, #22952-076,
Petitioner,
v.
CHIEF U.S. MARSHAL, et al.,
Respondents.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 3:16-CV-2759-L
ORDER
On November 7, 2016, Magistrate Judge Renée Harris Toliver entered the Findings,
Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), recommending
that the court dismiss without prejudice this case, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b),
for want of prosecution. No objections to the Report were received as of the date of this order.
Having reviewed the pleadings, file, record in this case, and Report, the court determines that
the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the
court. Accordingly, the court dismisses without prejudice this action for want of prosecution
pursuant to Rule 41(b).
The court prospectively certifies that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good
faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). In support of this certification, the court
accepts and incorporates by reference the Report. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 and
n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the Report, the court finds that any appeal of this action would
present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707
F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). In the event of an appeal, Plaintiff may challenge this certification
Order – Page 1
by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal with the clerk of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202; Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5).
It is so ordered this 29th day of November, 2016.
_________________________________
Sam A. Lindsay
United States District Judge
Order – Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?