Lu v. Ng
Filing
52
ORDER ACCEPTING 51 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Defendant's 25 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Cause of Action [and] Motion for Failure to Plead Properly are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 12/14/2017) (axm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
YUNG-KAI LU,
Plaintiff,
v.
GARY NG,
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 3:16-CV-2774-M (BH)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings,
Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, for plain error, I am of
the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are
accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.
For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United
States Magistrate Judge, the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Cause of Action
[and] Motion for Failure to Plead Properly (doc. 25), filed March 21, 2017, are GRANTED in part
and DENIED in part. The plaintiff’s claim against the defendant for engaging in the unauthorized
practice of law is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be
granted.
SIGNED this 14th day of December, 2017.
_________________________________
BARBARA M. G. LYNN
CHIEF JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?