Saleh v. Time Warner Cable

Filing 30

ORDER ADOPTING 27 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 3/13/2017) (aaa)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION FAISEL SALEH, Plaintiff, VS. TIME WARNER CABLE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-2782-G (BN) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. See docket entry 27. An objection was filed by plaintiff. See docket entry 28. The district court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the court ACCEPTS the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court GRANTS defendant’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings (docket entry 13) but allows plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint and notes that during the pendency of the findings, conclusions, and recommendation plaintiff did, in fact, file a new motion seeking leave to amend his complaint in this action, see docket entry 29. As to plaintiff’s motion to dismiss this action without prejudice, see docket entry 19, through plaintiff’s objection, along with his filing of another motion seeking leave to amend his complaint in this action, plaintiff has made clear his intent to continue to prosecute the current action. As such, plaintiff’s motion to dismiss (docket entry 19) is DENIED as moot. The court further DENIES plaintiff’s motion to transfer (docket entry 25) and RECOMMITS this action to Judge Horan for pretrial management. SO ORDERED. March 13, 2017. ___________________________________ A. JOE FISH Senior United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?