Gillaspie v. Warden Mackey et al
Filing
60
ORDER ACCEPTING 58 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The petitioner's motion is construed as arising under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) and is hereby DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 10/4/2017) (sss)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
ZACHARY DON GILLASPIE,
ID # 2055943,
Petitioner,
vs.
WARDEN MACKEY, et al.,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 3:16-CV-2833-B (BH)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of
the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United
States Magistrate Judge, the petitioner’s motion is construed as arising under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 59(e) and is hereby DENIED.
SO ORDERED on this 4th day of September, 2017.
_________________________________
JANE J. BOYLE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?