McGee v. Dallas Police Department et al

Filing 10

ORDER: On 12/19/2016, Plaintiff filed objections and a motion for extension of time to respond to the Magistrate Judge's Questionnaire. (ECF No. 9 .) The Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff thirty days from the date of this order to respond to the Questionnaire. The Court hereby VACATES its 12/5/2016, 8 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul D Stickney on 1/5/2017) (sss)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION KAMON RENARD MCGEE, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) v. DALLAS POLICE DEPT., ET AL., Defendants. No. 3:16-CV-2928-M ORDER On December 5, 2016, the Court entered Findings, Conclusions and a Recommendation that this complaint be dismissed for want of prosecution because Plaintiff failed to respond to the Magistrate Judge’s Questionnaire. (ECF No. 8.) On December 19, 2016, Plaintiff filed objections and a motion for extension of time to respond to the Magistrate Judge’s Questionnaire. (ECF No. 9.) The Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff thirty days from the date of this order to respond to the Questionnaire. The Court hereby VACATES its December 5, 2016, Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 5th day of January, 2017. _____________________________________ PAUL D. STICKNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?