Hendricks et al v. Uhlfelder et al
Filing
35
ORDER: After considering the motions, briefs, evidence, pleadings, record in this case, and Report, the court determines that the 33 Findings and Recommendations of the magistrate judge are correct, accepts them as those of the court, and over rules Plaintiffs' objections. Accordingly, the court grants Defendants' Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Docs. 7 , 9 ) and dismisses without prejudice this action for lack of personal jurisdiction. All costs are taxed against Plaintiffs. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 4/13/2017) (epm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
THOMAS EARL HENDRICKS and
STDWEH, LP,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DANIEL W. UHLFELDER and
CYNTHIA S. TUNNICLIFF,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 3:16-CV-3020-L
ORDER
On March 23, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney entered the Findings,
Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) (Doc. 33),
recommending that the court grant Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction
(Docs. 7, 9) and dismiss without prejudice this action for lack of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiffs
Thomas Earl Hendricks and STDWEH, LP (“Plaintiffs”) filed objections to the Report on April 5,
2017 (Doc. 34).
After considering the motions, briefs, evidence, pleadings, record in this case, and Report,
the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, accepts
them as those of the court, and overrules Plaintiffs’ objections. Accordingly, the court grants
Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Docs. 7, 9) and dismisses
without prejudice this action for lack of personal jurisdiction. All costs are taxed against Plaintiffs.
It is so ordered this 13th day of April, 2017.
_________________________________
Sam A. Lindsay
United States District Judge
Order – Solo Page
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?