Misko v. Jane Backes
ORDER ACCEPTING 20 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 8 ] is DENIED. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 8/3/2017) (sss)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JANE BACKES d/b/a BACKES
No. 3:16-CV-3080-M (BF)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of
United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney dated July 14, 2017. The Court has made a de
novo review of those portions of the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation to
which objections were made. The objections are overruled.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 8] is
The Court also denies Defendant’s alternate Motion for More Definite Statement.
SO ORDERED, this 3rd day of August, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?