Elliott v. The United States of America et al
Filing
19
Order Accepting 15 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of theUnited States Magistrate Judge. It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff's claims that Defendants Sgt. Greg Nottingham and Lt. Sherman failed to protect him shall proceed and process shall be issued as to these Defendants, the United States Marshal Service shall serve process on Defendants at the Hunt County Jail. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 7/17/2017) (ykp)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
MICHAEL ELLIOTT,
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
No. 3:16-CV-3231-B
)
(Consolidated with
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL.,
)
No. 3:16-CV-3232-B)
Defendants.
)
ORDER
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in
this case. Petitioner filed objections, and the District Court has made a de novo review of those
portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which objection was made. The objections
are overruled, and the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the
United States Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
(1)
Plaintiff’s claims that Defendants Sgt. Greg Nottingham and Lt. Sherman failed to protect
him shall proceed and process shall be issued as to these Defendants, the United States
Marshal Service shall serve process on Defendants at the Hunt County Jail;
(2)
Plaintiff’s claims against all other Defendants are dismissed;
(3)
The Clerk shall transmit a true copy of this Order to Plaintiff;
(4)
A copy of this order shall be mailed to the Hunt County District Attorney’s Office;
(5)
The Clerk of the Court shall return this case to the district judge for further proceedings and
issue summons.
Signed this 17th day of July, 2017.
_________________________________
JANE J. BOYLE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?