Graham v. City of Dallas

Filing 12

ORDER: Because the plaintiff has now responded, the 2/3/2017 10 findings, conclusions, and recommendation are hereby VACATED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 2/13/2017) (mcrd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
LAKETTA GRAHAM,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CITY OF DALLAS,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:16-CV-3512-G-BH

Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge

ORDER
Pursuant to Special Order No. 3-251, this pro so case has been automatically referred for full
case management. On February 3, 2017, it was recommended that this action be dismissed under
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for want of prosecution because the plaintiff had failed to respond to a Second
Magistrate Judge’s Questionnaire by January 27, 2017, as ordered. (See doc. 10.) On February 3,
2017, within the time for objection to the recommendation, she filed answers to the questionnaire.
Because the plaintiff has now responded, the February 3, 2017 findings, conclusions, and recommendation are hereby VACATED.
SO ORDERED on this 13th day of February, 2017.

___________________________________
IRMA CARRILLO RAMIREZ
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE