Graham v. City of Dallas
ORDER: Because the plaintiff has now responded, the 2/3/2017 10 findings, conclusions, and recommendation are hereby VACATED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 2/13/2017) (mcrd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CITY OF DALLAS,
Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge
Pursuant to Special Order No. 3-251, this pro so case has been automatically referred for full
case management. On February 3, 2017, it was recommended that this action be dismissed under
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for want of prosecution because the plaintiff had failed to respond to a Second
Magistrate Judge’s Questionnaire by January 27, 2017, as ordered. (See doc. 10.) On February 3,
2017, within the time for objection to the recommendation, she filed answers to the questionnaire.
Because the plaintiff has now responded, the February 3, 2017 findings, conclusions, and recommendation are hereby VACATED.
SO ORDERED on this 13th day of February, 2017.
IRMA CARRILLO RAMIREZ
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?