Chang v. USA

Filing 5

Order Accepting 4 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the court denies Petitioners Petition for a Writ of Error Coram Nobis; and dismisses without prejudice this action for lack of jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 2/21/2017) (epm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
SAMMY SUNGBUM CHANG,
aka SUNG BUM CHANG,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Civil Action No. 3:17-CV-98-L

ORDER
This habeas case, which was brought as a petition for writ of error coram nobis, was
referred to United States Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez, who entered the Findings,
Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) on January
13, 2017. The Report recommends that the court deny Petitioner’s habeas petition and dismiss
without prejudice this action for lack of jurisdiction. Alternatively, to the extent the petitioner is
no longer in custody for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2255, the Report recommends the petition for
writ of error coram nobis be denied. No objections were filed to the Report.
Having reviewed the Report and the record in this case, the court determines that the
findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the
court. Accordingly, the court denies Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Error Coram Nobis; and
dismisses without prejudice this action for lack of jurisdiction.
It is so ordered this 21st day of February, 2017.

_________________________________
Sam A. Lindsay
United States District Judge
Order – Solo Page