Awan v. Harmon et al

Filing 17

ORDER: The 13 Findings, Conclusion, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Awan's 12 petition for a certificate of appealability is DENIED as unnecessary and his request to stay pending appeal is DENIED. Because Awan has failed to comply with the Court's previous order to pay the $400.00 filing fee, it is further ORDERED that the above-styled and -numbered civil action is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 5/1/2017) (sss)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION KHALID AW AN, ID 350959-956, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN D. J. HARMON, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 3: 17-CV-O 130-C ORDER On this day, the Court considered Plaintiff Khalid Awan's Petition for a Grant of a Certificate of Appealability, filed April 4, 2017. The United States Magistrate Judge entered her Findings, Conclusion, and Recommendation on April 5, 2017, recommending that a certificate of appealability should be denied as unnecessary and that Awan's included motion to stay pending an appeal should also be denied. Awan failed to file any objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation and the time to do so has now expired. The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusion, and Recommendation for clear error and finds none. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusion, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Awan's petition for a certificate of appealability is DENIED as unnecessary and his request to stay pending appeal is DENIED. Because Awan has failed to comply with the Court's previous order to pay the $400.00 filing fee, it is further ORDERED that the above-styled and -numbered civil action is DISMISSED without prejudice. All relief not expressly granted by this Order is DENIED. A- so ORDERED this _j__.:.__ day of May, 2017. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?