Awan v. Harmon et al

Filing 33

ORDER granting the plaintiff's 32 Motion to Accept Filing Fee Payment Nunc Pro Tunc. Because the plaintiff has now paid the filing fee, the 31 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for dismissal are hereby VACATED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 9/24/2018) (mcrd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION KHALID AWAN, ID # 50959-956, Plaintiff, vs. WARDEN D.J. HARMON, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:17-CV-130-C ORDER By Special Order No. 3-251, this case has been automatically referred for full case management. Before the Court is the plaintiff’s Motion to Accept Filing Fee Payment Nunc Pro Tunc, received on September 21, 2018 (doc. 32). He essentially seeks leave to pay the filing fee after the deadline of September 12, 2018, which was set by the order dated August 22, 2018 (doc. 30). He contends that the order was not mailed until September 4, 2018, and that he did not receive it until September 11, 2018, because he is currently in Canada. He paid the filing fee on September 21, 2018. (See doc. 32 at 1, 3, 5.) The motion is GRANTED. On September 19, 2018, it was recommended that this action be dismissed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute or comply with a court order because the plaintiff had failed to pay the filing fee by September 12, 2018, as ordered. (See doc. 14.) Because the plaintiff has now paid the filing fee, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation for dismissal are hereby VACATED. SO ORDERED this 24th day of September, 2018. ___________________________________ IRMA CARRILLO RAMIREZ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?