Robinson v Hunt County et al
Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation re: 37 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 6 Motion for Injunction filed by Deanna J Robinson. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's for Preliminary Injunction, filed on March 2, 2017 (Doc. No. 6 ), is hereby DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 2/13/2018) (ndt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DEANNA J. ROBINSON,
HUNT COUNTY TEXAS, et al.,
CIVIL NO. 3:17-CV-0513-K
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a
recommendation in this case. Plaintiff filed Objections on December 28, 2017 (Doc.
No. 38); Defendants’ filed a Response to Plaintiff’s Objections on January 24, 2018
(Doc. No. 42); and Plaintiff filed a Reply to Defendants’ Response to Plaintiff’s
Objections, on February 9, 2018 (Doc. No. 46).
The District Court has reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed
findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and
reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for
plain error. Finding no error, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff’s Objections to the
findings, conclusions, and a recommendation are OVERRULED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s for Preliminary Injunction,
filed on March 2, 2017 (Doc. No. 6), is hereby DENIED.
Signed February 13th, 2018.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?