Pickett v. Williams etal

Filing 13

ORDER re: 11 Findings and Recommendations on Case. On 4/4/2017, it was recommended that this action be dismissed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute or follow court orders because the plaintiff had failed to respond to a Magistrate Judge's Questionnaire as ordered. Because the plaintiff has now responded, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation are hereby VACATED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 5/3/2017) (axm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
JODY WAYNE PICKETT,
Plaintiff,
vs.
BRIAN WILLIAMS, et. al,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:17-CV-557-C-BH
Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge

ORDER
Pursuant to Special Order No. 3-251, this pro se case has been automatically referred for
pretrial management. On April 7, 2017, it was recommended that this action be dismissed under
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute or follow court orders because the plaintiff had
failed to respond to a Magistrate Judge’s Questionnaire as ordered. (See doc. 11.) On May 2,
2017, he filed his answers to the questionnaire. (See doc. 12.) Because the plaintiff has now
responded, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation are hereby VACATED.
SO ORDERED on May 3, 2017.

___________________________________
IRMA CARRILLO RAMIREZ
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE