United States of America v. Pierce
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 8 Motion for Default Judgment and Plaintiff is entitled to and shall recover from Defendant the amount of $13,415.23. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 4/12/2017) (ran)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
ROBERT C. PIERCE, JR.,
Civil Action No. 3:17-CV-573-L
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Before the court is the United States’ Motion for Default Judgment, filed April 6, 2017.
After careful consideration of the motion, appendix, record, and applicable law, the court grants
the United States’ Motion for Default Judgment.
The United States (“Plaintiff” or “United States”) filed Plaintiff’s Complaint
(“Complaint”) on February 28, 2017, against Robert C. Pierce, Jr. (“Defendant” or “Pierce”). This
action arises from the failure of Pierce to make the required payments on loans he obtained on or
about August 14, 1995.
The loan was disbursed for $2,625 and $3,795 on September 26, 1995, at a variable rate of
interest to be established annually by the Department of Education. The loan obligation was
guaranteed by Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation, and then reinsured by the Department
of Education under loan guaranty programs authorized under Title IV-B of the Higher Education
Act of 1965, as amended, 20 U.S.C. 1071 et seq. (34 C.F.R. Part 682). The United States
Department of Education is the owner and holder of the promissory note. After demand of
payment by the United States, Pierce defaulted on the loan on September 1, 2000.
Memorandum Opinion and Order – Page 1
Pierce was served with a copy of the summons and Complaint on March 9, 2017. He was
required to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by March 30, 2017, 21 days after service
of the summons and Complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12. To this date, Pierce has not answered or
otherwise responded to the Complaint.
On April 6, 2017, the United States requested the clerk of court to enter a default against
Pierce, and the clerk made an entry of default against Pierce the same day. Plaintiff now requests
the court to enter a default judgment against Pierce and award it damages and applicable interest
as a result of his default.
A party is entitled to entry of a default by the clerk of the court if the opposing party fails
to plead or otherwise defend as required by law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Under Rule 55(a), a default
must be entered before the court may enter a default judgment. Id.; New York Life Ins. Co. v.
Brown, 84 F.3d 137, 141 (5th Cir. 1996). The clerk of court has entered a default against Pierce.
The court also finds, based upon the information in the record, that Defendant is not a minor,
incompetent person, or member of the United States military.
Pierce, by failing to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, has admitted the
well-pleaded allegations of the Complaint and is precluded from contesting the established facts
on appeal. Nishimatsu Constr. Co. v. Houston Nat’l Bank, 515 F.2d 1200, 1206 (5th Cir. 1975)
(citations omitted). Based on the well-pleaded allegations of Plaintiff’s Complaint, which the court
accepts as true, and the record in this action, the court determines that Pierce is in default and that
the United States is entitled to a default judgment and appropriate damages.
Based on the record, the total amount that Pierce owed the United States as of February 14,
2017, was $13,369.99 ($8,205.85 in principal and $5,164.14 in interest). Interest accrues on the
Memorandum Opinion and Order – Page 2
principal at the rate of $0.78 per day. The number of days from February 14, 2017, to April 12,
2017, is 58, which results in additional interest in the amount of $45.24. Therefore, the total
amount of judgment to which the United States is entitled is $13,415.23.
For the reasons herein stated, the court grants the United States’ Motion for Default
Judgment, and Plaintiff is entitled to and shall recover from Defendant the amount of $13,415.23.
The court will enter judgment by separate document, as required by Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 58, in the amount stated in favor of the United States.
It is so ordered this 12th day of April, 2017.
Sam A. Lindsay
United States District Judge
Memorandum Opinion and Order – Page 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?