Brown v. Spring et al

Filing 10

ORDER: The 9 findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are adopted. Plaintiff's 5/4/2017 post-judgment 9 application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs is liberally construed as a motion to reopen this closed case under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), and is denied. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 5/30/2017) (sss)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TRAVIS DEMOYNE BROWN, Plaintiff, vs. DR. NEIL SPRING, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:17-CV-0787-D ORDER After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the court concludes that the findings and conclusions are correct. It is therefore ordered that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are adopted. Plaintiff’s May 4, 2017 post-judgment application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs is liberally construed as a motion to reopen this closed case under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), and is denied. SO ORDERED. May 30, 2017. _________________________________ SIDNEY A. FITZWATER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?