Brown v. Spring et al
Filing
10
ORDER: The 9 findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are adopted. Plaintiff's 5/4/2017 post-judgment 9 application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs is liberally construed as a motion to reopen this closed case under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), and is denied. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 5/30/2017) (sss)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
TRAVIS DEMOYNE BROWN,
Plaintiff,
vs.
DR. NEIL SPRING, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 3:17-CV-0787-D
ORDER
After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the
findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the court concludes that the
findings and conclusions are correct. It is therefore ordered that the findings, conclusions, and
recommendation of the magistrate judge are adopted.
Plaintiff’s May 4, 2017 post-judgment application to proceed in district court without
prepaying fees or costs is liberally construed as a motion to reopen this closed case under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 60(b), and is denied.
SO ORDERED.
May 30, 2017.
_________________________________
SIDNEY A. FITZWATER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?